The concept of a bounded function is central to mathematical analysis. Today, we’ll explore a fascinating problem that asks us to prove that ##f(x) = \log_2 (1 – x) + x + x^2 + x^4 + x^8 + …## is a bounded function on the interval ##[0, 1)##. This means we need to show that the function’s values stay within certain limits, never shooting off to infinity. It’s a delicate balance between the logarithmic term and the power series, so let’s see how it all works out.

---

---

Welcome to a deep dive into proving the boundedness of a specific function. This problem combines elements of calculus, series, and inequalities, offering a comprehensive exercise in mathematical analysis. We aim to demonstrate that the function ##f(x) = \log_2 (1 – x) + x + x^2 + x^4 + x^8 + …## is bounded for all ##x## in the interval ##[0, 1)##. This involves clever manipulation and understanding of logarithmic and power series behaviors.

Understanding the Bounded Function

The core challenge is to show that the given function, which includes a logarithmic term and an infinite sum of powers of ##x##, does not grow without bound as ##x## approaches 1. The logarithmic term ##\log_2(1 – x)## tends to negative infinity as ##x## approaches 1, while the sum of powers tends to increase. Balancing these behaviors is key to proving the boundedness of the bounded function.

To tackle this, we need to carefully analyze the convergence and behavior of the infinite series and find a way to counteract the unbounded nature of the logarithmic term. This requires techniques such as comparing the series to known convergent series or using integral approximations. The goal is to establish that the sum remains within finite limits.

Analyzing the Infinite Series

The infinite series ##x + x^2 + x^4 + x^8 + …## is a sum of powers of ##x##, where the exponents are powers of 2. This series converges for ##x## in the interval ##[0, 1)## because each term is smaller than the previous one, and the terms approach zero as the power increases. Understanding the rate of convergence is crucial for determining the overall behavior of the bounded function.

We can compare this series to a geometric series to estimate its sum. A geometric series has the form ##\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} ar^n##, where ##a## is the first term and ##r## is the common ratio. By finding a suitable geometric series that bounds our given series, we can establish an upper limit on its sum. This helps in managing the positive growth of the series as ##x## approaches 1.

Logarithmic Term Behavior

The logarithmic term ##\log_2(1 – x)## approaches negative infinity as ##x## approaches 1. To show that the entire function is bounded, we need to demonstrate that the positive growth of the infinite series counteracts this negative growth. This involves finding a lower bound for the series that is close enough to the logarithmic term to keep the function within finite limits. Understanding this balance is vital for proving the bounded function.

We can use the properties of logarithms to rewrite the term and make it easier to compare with the series. For example, we can use the change of base formula to convert the base of the logarithm or use logarithmic identities to simplify the expression. The aim is to manipulate the logarithmic term so that it can be directly compared with the terms in the infinite series, facilitating the proof of boundedness.

Combining Series and Logarithm

To prove the boundedness of the bounded function, we combine the analysis of the infinite series and the logarithmic term. We need to show that the sum of the series is always greater than or equal to the absolute value of the logarithmic term, up to a constant. This ensures that the function does not go to negative infinity as ##x## approaches 1. This requires careful algebraic manipulation and inequality estimation.

One approach is to find a function that bounds the difference between the series and the logarithmic term. If we can show that this difference is always less than a certain constant, then we have proven that the original function is bounded. This involves techniques such as finding the maximum value of the difference or using calculus to analyze its behavior.

Final Proof of Bounded Function

The final step is to present a rigorous proof that the function ##f(x) = \log_2 (1 – x) + x + x^2 + x^4 + x^8 + …## is bounded for ##x \in [0, 1)##. This involves synthesizing all the previous analyses and presenting a clear, logical argument. The proof should demonstrate that the function remains within finite limits as ##x## approaches 1, thereby establishing its boundedness. A well-structured proof is essential for convincing others of the result.

To complete the proof, we must show that there exist constants ##M## and ##N## such that ##M \le f(x) \le N## for all ##x \in [0, 1)##. This requires finding appropriate bounds for both the logarithmic term and the infinite series, and then combining these bounds to establish the overall boundedness of the function. The final proof should be clear, concise, and mathematically sound.

Similar Problems and Quick Solutions

Problem 1: Prove that ##g(x) = \log_3 (1 – x) + x + x^3 + x^9 + …## is bounded for ##x \in [0, 1)##.

Solution: Similar approach using logarithm base 3 and analyzing the series.

Problem 2: Show that ##h(x) = \log_2 (1 – x^2) + x^2 + x^4 + x^8 + …## is bounded for ##x \in [0, 1)##.

Solution: Substitute ##x^2## for ##x## and apply similar bounding techniques.

Problem 3: Demonstrate that ##k(x) = \log_2 (1 – x) + 2x + 2x^2 + 2x^4 + …## is bounded for ##x \in [0, 1)##.

Solution: Adjust coefficients in the series and re-evaluate the bounds.

Problem 4: Prove that ##l(x) = \log_2 (1 – x) + x + \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^4}{4} + …## is bounded for ##x \in [0, 1)##.

Solution: Analyze the modified series with different coefficients.

Problem 5: Show that ##m(x) = \log_2 (1 – 2x) + x + x^2 + x^4 + …## is bounded for ##x \in [0, 0.5)##.

Solution: Adjust the domain and re-evaluate the logarithmic term.

---

---